Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
communication_of_science [2007-10-12 12:29] – theunkarelsecommunication_of_science [2007-10-12 12:42] (current) – theunkarelse
Line 194: Line 194:
 Working with: Working with:
   * diabetics.   * diabetics.
 +  * people with burns.
   * congenital heart defects.   * congenital heart defects.
   * mentally disabled.   * mentally disabled.
Line 235: Line 236:
     * treating other types of knowledge such as a patients daily experience as equal to scientific knowledge can be felt as a threat to their authority by scientists.     * treating other types of knowledge such as a patients daily experience as equal to scientific knowledge can be felt as a threat to their authority by scientists.
     * patients are not 'naive' anymore but are well informed proto-professionals, which gives them a certain mindset similar to the scientists. The real 'naive' patients that you want, are hard to find.     * patients are not 'naive' anymore but are well informed proto-professionals, which gives them a certain mindset similar to the scientists. The real 'naive' patients that you want, are hard to find.
 +
 +===Conclusion. ===
 +
 +== How do the anticipated results pan-out? ==
 +
 +| ^ anticipated problems              ^ results                                        ^ 
 +^ |small impact on policy and science | a large impact due to involving patient groups |
 +^ |little public interest             | a much closer network with the general public  |
 +^ |results are not representative     | more implementation of research                |
 +^ |expensive                          | same                                           |
 +^ |science-illiteracy problem         | needs good moderation                          |
  
  

User Tools

Page Tools

Site Tools