Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- communication_of_science [2007-10-12 12:30] – theunkarelse
+++ communication_of_science [2007-10-12 12:42] (current) – theunkarelse
@@ Line 236: / Line 236: @@
     * treating other types of knowledge such as a patients daily experience as equal to scientific knowledge can be felt as a threat to their authority by scientists.
     * patients are not 'naive' anymore but are well informed proto-professionals, which gives them a certain mindset similar to the scientists. The real 'naive' patients that you want, are hard to find.
+===Conclusion. ===
+== How do the anticipated results pan-out? ==
+| ^ anticipated problems              ^ results                                        ^
+^ |small impact on policy and science | a large impact due to involving patient groups |
+^ |little public interest             | a much closer network with the general public  |
+^ |results are not representative     | more implementation of research                |
+^ |expensive                          | same                                           |
+^ |science-illiteracy problem         | needs good moderation                          |